THE THING 2011


MOVIE REVIEW
HOME FEO'S STORE REVIEWS INTERVIEWS FEO AMANTE THEATER SCIENCE MOMENT UNFAIR RACIAL CLICHÉ ALERT
Movies E.C. McMullen Jr. Review by
E.C.McMullen Jr.
The Thing 2011
THE THING
SEQUELS, PREQUELS, REMAKES
THE THING
GOODIES
THE THING - 2011
NEWS
THE THING - 2011
USA Release: Oct. 14, 2011
Morgan Creek Productions, Strike Entertainment, Universal Pictures
Rated: USA: R

Tracking down a signal, some fun loving Norwegians go barrelling across the frozen Antarctic wastes in a Snow Cat.

Along the way they enjoy a dirty joke, hit a hidden crevasse, and almost - but not quite - fall to their doom. While they pass the time enjoying their new perspective on gravity, they shine their lights into the crevasse to see what's down there.

Whoa!

Back in the good ol' U.S. of A., Adam Goodwin (Eric Christian Olsen: BLACK CAT RUN, CELLULAR) introduces forensic animal scientist grad student, Kate Lloyd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead: THE RING TWO, FINAL DESTINATION 3, GRINDHOUSE: DEATH PROOF) to Dr. Sander Halvorson (Ulrich Thomsen: CENTURION, SEASON OF THE WITCH). Dr. Halvorson explains that Kate needs to leave for Antarctica right now and will she? Kate says sure, let me grab my bag, and away we go on a very slow helicopter ride across the icy landscape.

On this flight are two American pilots, Sam Carter (Joel Edgerton) and Jameson (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje: THE MUMMY RETURNS, THE BOURNE IDENTITY) and this basically introduces us to some of the victims.

They get to base and we visit what was buried in the ice, which by this time everyone should know was an alien spacecraft from another world. Oddly enough, this entire scene was shot with such a lack of drama and - what should be - required amazement, that I was left there thinking, 'Gotcha. Spacecraft from another world. Anyhoo...'

TRIVIA

Since 2000, Morgan Creek Productions is also known for bringing us, BATTLEFIELD EARTH, EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING, and DREAM HOUSE.

This movie is not a remake of either of the first two THE THING movies, but a prequel of John Carpenter's classic. The producers have gone on record saying that the reason they gave it the title, THE THING, is that they couldn't think of a better title.
*WARNING* *WARNING*
THEY CAN'T EVEN THINK OF A BETTER TITLE!

How hard could it have been? Once you throw out the crappy titles like,

WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?

THE THING: THE MOTION PICTURE,

THE THING: THE MUSICAL

THE THING: RISE OF THE THING,

THE THING: REQUIEM,

THE THING: RESURRECTION,

THE THING: FIRST CONTACT,

THING: THE REVENGE,

DAWN OF THE THING,

THE THING VS. FREDDY,

THE THING X,

THE THING IN SPACE,

THING ONE and THING TWO,

FIRST THING, FIRST,

THE THING 3D,

BAD THING,

THE THING: NOT THE ONE THAT FOUGHT GODZILLA

and

THE THING: NOT THE FANTASTIC FOUR GUY

You still had perfectly good titles like,

TINGEN,

THE THING I,

THE TH1NG,

and of course,

WHO GOES THERE?

Now that problem? The yawning lack of suspense or amazement? It imbues the entire movie.

THE THING of 2011 is intended to launch a franchise in a way that both of the earlier movies never did.

That was the idea, but Morgan Creek has never launched a successful franchise. They have access to money and they don't know what creativity is or why its important to audiences.

With so much riding on this movie and the potential profitable franchise, who had the club-footed idea of hiring a Feature film freshman Director for a $35+ million dollar movie?

A guy with only a single short film he directed way back in 1996? It's not like Matthijs has shown any interest in feature film directing at all. So other than to intentionally waste your investor's money, why throw such a big budget at such an unproven person? Especially when there are so many proven Feature Directors who could have easily helmed this movie at this budget?

Writer Eric Hessier had a modest web hit with Dionaea House a while back. The upshot of Hollywood's attention over that got him writing credits on the reboot of A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET (2010), FINAL DESTINATION 5, and now THE THING (2011). Sadly for Mr. Hessier, every one of these movies were part of a franchise or an attempt to start or reinvigorate a franchise and all of them are not merely duds, but slaughtered any possibility of starting or keeping the franchise going.

Like Heijningen, Hessier could have had a chance if he was allowed to grow his ability instead of getting thrown at such high profile work. For the director and writer, their fall is that much greater and that's just not fair.

Producers Marc Abraham (END OF DAYS, DAWN OF THE DEAD (2004), SLITHER, CHILDREN OF MEN, THE LAST EXORCISM) and Eric Newman (DAWN OF THE DEAD (2004), SLITHER, CHILDREN OF MEN, THE LAST EXORCISM) put this together and did a botched job of it. It must be telling that the movie poster announced that THE THING is from the Producers who brought you DAWN OF THE DEAD (2004) and stops there, omitting all that came after.

THE THING (2011) is a cheese wheel full of plot holes.

Like the alien creatures who demonstrate the ability to move at lightning speed when they want to, and then move slug slow in a wrong-headed attempt to build suspense (or whatever point the film makers were trying to make), which gives the humans a chance to fight or flee them.

Cut to a dog chewing through a chain link confinement: That scene made perfect sense in John Carpenter's THE THING when the dogs were clearly terrified in the moment of an attack, choosing to tear up their mouths against metal in an attempt to escape. But when it happens in this movie, nothing has happened yet to impel the dog to do that! It's just, you know, passing doggy time by painfully chewing apart a metal chain link.

It's also made clear that these things can fly the spacecraft. So since they understand rudimentary and advanced mechanics, why would they attack the pilots of an aircraft in flight? They should want to get to mass populations (where the aircraft was taking them), that is the point made by the movie (repeatedly, did-diddly-iddly), and they've certainly experienced the danger of crashing before.

Sander Thing
If you think this Asylum Pictures / Syfy cgi looks bad at 300x640pixels,
imagine how awful it looks moving across your HD TV.
Even worse when I had to watch it on a giant theater screen.

As the movie progresses, the plot holes get bigger and start to join and, by the end, the whole flick implodes into the hole under the weight of its own poorly thought out tale and cheese ball CGI. Since AVATAR, there is no more excuse for making unrealistic Computer Graphic Images. Sitting there I knew, I'd been Morgan Creek'd again.

At one point, John Carpenter was supposed to be attached in a producer capacity. I can see why he may have pulled out.

I feel sorry for nearly everyone involved in making THE THING 2011, practical effects artists, actors, writer, and director included.

The only ones I don't pity are the benighted halfwits who green lit and guided this bone-head slopfest all the way to the theaters. Those numbskulls owe me.

Two Shriek Girls.

Shriek GirlsShriek Girls
This review copyright 2011 E.C.McMullen Jr.

The Thing (2011) on IMDb
CHANGE YOUR SHIRT
MORGAN CREEK'D AGAIN
BATTLEFIELD EARTH NIGHTBREED THE EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING
BATTLEFIELD EARTH
MOVIE REVIEW
NIGHTBREED
MOVIE REVIEW
THE EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING
MOVIE REVIEW

Return to Movies

FEO AMANTE'S HORROR THRILLER
Created by:
E.C.McMullen Jr.
COME FOLLOW ME @
Amazon
ECMJr
Feo Blog
IMDb
Instagram
Stage32
Twitter
YouTube
Zazzle Shop